dc.contributor.author | Anderson, Terry | |
dc.contributor.author | Rourke, Liam | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-06-26T21:42:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2007-06-26T21:42:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2004 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Rourke, L. & Anderson, T. (2004). Validity issues in quantitative computer conference transcript analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development 52(1) 5-18. | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1042–1629 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2149/733 | |
dc.description.abstract | Over the past 15 years, educational technologists have been dabbling with a research technique known as quantitative content analysis (QCA). Although it is characterized as a systematic and objective procedure for describing communication, readers find insufficient evidence of either quality in published reports. In this paper, it is argued that QCA should be conceived of as a form of testing and measurement. If this argument is successful, it becomes possible to frame many of the problems associated with QCA studies under the well-articulated rubric of test validity. Two sets of procedures for developing the validity of a QCA coding protocol are provided, (a) one for developing a protocol that is theoretically valid and (b) one for establishing its validity empirically. The paper is concerned specifically with the use of QCA to study educational applications of computer-mediated communication. | en |
dc.format.extent | 118591 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | | en |
dc.publisher | Educational Technology Research and Development | en |
dc.relation.uri | http://0-www.metapress.com.aupac.lib.athabascau.ca/content/r78747453hr05652/fulltext.pdf | |
dc.subject | educational technologists | en |
dc.subject | quantitative | en |
dc.subject | content | en |
dc.subject | analysis | en |
dc.subject | qca | en |
dc.subject | validity | en |
dc.title | Validity Issues In Quantitative Computer Conference Transcript Analysis | en |
dc.type | Article | en |