dc.contributor.author | Briton, Derek | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2008-04-23T15:39:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2008-04-23T15:39:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Briton, D. (2006) Teaching and research: Learning’s twin poles. Presentation to the 2nd Canadian Summit on the Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning, University of Alberta, Edmonton. | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2149/1555 | |
dc.description.abstract | One reason I wanted to be here today is
because I have a nagging concern about
the drive to incorporate research more
explicitly into teaching.
It’s reminiscent of the drive for "quality"
education in schools, which is also, in
principle, very difficult to argue against.
The problem with terms such as "research"
and "quality" is how they are defined.
Many people did, in fact, begin arguing
against "quality" education once it became
apparent that the measure of quality was
standardized testing.
I have a similar concern about how some
may choose to define "research" and how it
will be measured.
I’m particularly concerned that it NOT be
about indoctrinating students into
preordained research methods so they can
better meet funders’ and industry’s goals for
more applied research. | en |
dc.format.extent | 82150 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | 2nd Canadian Summit on the Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning | en |
dc.subject | teaching | en |
dc.subject | research | en |
dc.subject | Boyer Report | en |
dc.subject | education | en |
dc.title | Teaching & Research: Learning's Twin Poles | en |
dc.type | Article | en |