Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCabaj, Mark
dc.date.accessioned2007-07-30T05:53:11Z
dc.date.available2007-07-30T05:53:11Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.citationVolume 11 Number 2 19-21en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2149/1027
dc.description.abstractFunders and policy analysts have unrealistic notions about evaluating CED, which applies unique combinations of resources to complex social and economic problems. That said, community groups could improve their effectiveness and credibility by building evaluation methods right into their strategies. In particular, these groups must make an extra effort to see how they can distinguish the specific effects of their work from other factors: in other words, the "incremental" impact of their initiative.en
dc.format.extent169057 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMaking Wavesen
dc.subjectCEDen
dc.subjectevaluationen
dc.subjectcommunityen
dc.subjectsocial economyen
dc.titleIncrementality - This Strange Term Is Key To Setting Realistic Goals And Standards For CED Practiceen
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record



AU logo
Athabasca University Library & Scholarly Resources
Phone: (800) 788-9041 ext 6254 | Email: library@athabascau.ca
Fax: (780) 675-6477 | Hours: Monday-Friday 8:30am - 4:30pm (MT) | Privacy
Focused on the future of learning.