Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLockhart, Sandy
dc.contributor.authorMcNair, Don
dc.date.accessioned2007-07-30T05:38:13Z
dc.date.available2007-07-30T05:38:13Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.citationVolume 14 Number 4 25-30en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2149/1024
dc.description.abstractIndicators are complicated and sensitive instruments, no question. So whenever they get applied to community development, there is a trade-off between technical standards and local engagement. Often (too often) that trade-off favours the former, to the benefit of organizations of great merit but no great commitment to building community capacity. Two initiatives in the Pacific Northwest, the Community Resilience process and the Oregon Benchmarks, show how to make indicators integral to community-based planning and change. Also included is a critical analysis of recent experiments with genuine progress indices in Atlantic Canada, "Kings County GPI."en
dc.format.extent293691 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMaking Wavesen
dc.subjectcommunity developmenten
dc.subjectplanningen
dc.subjectsocial economyen
dc.subjectcommunity-baseden
dc.titleWorks In Progress: Keeping The Measurement Of A Community's Progress Community-Centreden
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record



AU logo
Athabasca University Library & Scholarly Resources
Phone: (800) 788-9041 ext 6254 | Email: library@athabascau.ca
Fax: (780) 675-6477 | Hours: Monday-Friday 8:30am - 4:30pm (MT) | Privacy
Focused on the future of learning.