Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTorjman, Sherri
dc.identifier.citationVolume 11 Number 2 15-17en
dc.description.abstractThis commentary challenges the obsession with outcomes as part of the preoccupation with accountability. It recognises the need for clearly defined targets, but it argues that many crucial and equally important developments can be inadvertently overlooked in the question to quantify. This practice runs the risk of ignoring some of the most valuable accomplishments CED organizations or other community organizations can make. Using the experience of a well known and respected CED organization in southern Ontario as a case in point, she argues that their research on its effectiveness challenges the conventional wisdom that “sees social well-being merely as a fringe benefit of a well performing economy.” Quite the opposite, says the author, asserting that growing evidence indicates that social cohesion, represented by dense networks and social infrastructure, are crucial to economic performance.en
dc.format.extent133876 bytes
dc.publisherMaking Wavesen
dc.subjectsocial economyen
dc.subjectsocial infrastructureen
dc.titleAre Outcomes The Best Outcome?en

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

AU logo
Athabasca University Library & Scholarly Resources
Phone: (800) 788-9041 ext 6254 | Email:
Fax: (780) 675-6477 | Hours: Monday-Friday 8:30am - 4:30pm (MT) | Privacy
Focused on the future of learning.