<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/">
  <channel>
    <title>AUSpace Collection: Theses</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2149/1177</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2149/1300" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2149/1299" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel>
  <textInput>
    <title>The Collection's search engine</title>
    <description>Search the Channel</description>
    <name>search</name>
    <link>http://auspace.athabascau.ca/simple-search</link>
  </textInput>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2149/1300">
    <title>Selective predation in a polyphagous invertebrate predator, Pardosa vancouveri (Arachnida, Araneae)</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2149/1300</link>
    <description>Title: Selective predation in a polyphagous invertebrate predator, Pardosa vancouveri (Arachnida, Araneae)
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Holmberg, Robert G.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: Selective predation (i.e., non-random feeding) was&#xD;
studied in a laboratory system that allowed individual&#xD;
lycosid spiders, Pardosa vancouveri. to feed on prey&#xD;
populations consisting of one or two kinds of insects.&#xD;
Various combinations of male and female fruit flies&#xD;
(DrosoPhila melanogaster) ‘small’ and 'large' beetle larvae&#xD;
(Tenebrio solitor) , and nymphal milkweed bugs (Oncopeltus&#xD;
fasciatus) were used as prey. Spiders of both sexes and two&#xD;
age classes were used as predators. In 14 experiments, the&#xD;
spiders shoved strong selection in six, moderate to weak&#xD;
selection in five, and very weak or no selection in three.&#xD;
Generally, fruit flies were selected by the spiders over&#xD;
mealworms or milkweed bugs, and 'small1 mealworms over&#xD;
'large’ ones. Very weak or no selection occurred between male&#xD;
and female flies and between beetle larvae and milkweed bugs.&#xD;
Subadult and adult spiders always showed similar selective&#xD;
tendencies. Prior feeding experiences did not alter feeding&#xD;
selections, but changes in the physical complexity of the&#xD;
environment did. Thus, by adding tree leaves to the cages,&#xD;
the number of flies eaten by the spiders decreased&#xD;
significantly.&#xD;
Potential benefits to the spiders which were measured&#xD;
included percent maturing, percent surviving, rate of weight&#xD;
gain, size gain, and production of false egg-sacs, in prey&#xD;
combinations that produced moderate to strong selection, 7&#xD;
out of 28 benefit measurements statistically favored the&#xD;
spiders. Prey combinations that produced weak selection&#xD;
tendencies gave no benefit measurements (N » 26) that&#xD;
statistically favored the spiders. Spiders fed the less-selected&#xD;
prey exhibited no benefits that were superior to&#xD;
those fed the more-selected prey. Spiders fed the more-selected&#xD;
prey did just as well as spiders fed both prey. It&#xD;
is hypothesized that this particular selective predation&#xD;
process involves prey sampling, memory of prey attributes,&#xD;
and selection of prey that possess certain attributes.&#xD;
Selected prey seem to confer certain benefits to the&#xD;
predator. As most benefits were associated with increased&#xD;
biomass within time limits, £. vancouveri tends to be more an&#xD;
energy maximizer than a time minimizer.</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2149/1299">
    <title>The odoriferous glands of some Palpatores Phalangida (Opiliones) (Arachnida)</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2149/1299</link>
    <description>Title: The odoriferous glands of some Palpatores Phalangida (Opiliones) (Arachnida)
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Holmberg, Robert G.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: The odoriferous glands of especially Phalangium opilio and to a lesser extent Opiliones parietinus, Odiellus pictus, Homolophus biceps, Leiobunum calcar and L.. vittatum were investigated by: external examination; dissection; light microscopy; predator-phalangid encounter&#xD;
experiments with amphibians, birds, mammals, spiders, centipedes and ants. Amphibian stomach content analysis and a field experiment involving frogs as predators were also performed. &#xD;
&#xD;
No liquid odoriferous gland secretion was observed externally in P. opilio, O. parietinus or O. pictus. Liquid secretion may have been present in H. biceps. Only P. opilio and H. biceps produced a detectable odor.&#xD;
&#xD;
Observations on the construction of the glands confirmed previous, descriptions. However, it was shown that the phalangids studied have some control over which gland operates and that the secretions probably differ between species. &#xD;
&#xD;
Vertebrate-phalangid encounter experiments suggest that all vertebrate predators can eat phalangids of the suborder Palpatores without harm.&#xD;
&#xD;
Although a number of spiders and one species of centipede were not repelled by the odoriferous glands, some spiders and an ant species were repelled. It is concluded that phalangid odoriferous glands are most likely defensive in function, although limited in effectiveness, and are not used for trail marking, species recognition, sexual recognition, anti-microbial protection or excretion.</description>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

